Rules are not followed just because they are written down.

They are followed when they are easy to follow. That goes for your people and your systems alike — and the mechanism behind it is the same.

What is it that has to comply?

Too many rules at once, and fewer of them get followed. That holds for a person and for a model.

It is one mechanism, and we have measured it on both sides.

On a model: the more rules in play at once, the fewer get followed. We have measured it, and the numbers are on the AI page.

On people: it is why a mandatory course that goes through the whole rule-set once a year rarely changes anything. Not because people do not care — because nobody can hold 56 things in their head while they work.

The treatment is the same in both places: show the one rule that is relevant, where the decision is made — and remove what makes it hard to follow. The method behind it is Behavioral Friction Theory.

We have also written about it as research: Compliance is behaviour, not information — which is why repeating a rule people already know does not help.

What we have built

How it holds up to an inspection

We route on consequence: the decisions that matter to a person go past a person — however certain the model sounds. And we measure and disclose how often that routing gets it wrong.

If you are unsure which requirements apply to you, call or write. It takes ten minutes to find out, and it costs nothing.

Often the answer is both — the system has to be documentable, and the people have to be able to use it correctly.

Which rule is the one that is not followed where you are?

Tell us what you have to comply with, and who it applies to. Then we work out what is in the way — and what has to change.

Get in touch